From the category archives:

Web 2.0

 
"The study found that 65 percent of the largest 100 international companies have active accounts on Twitter, 54 percent have a Facebook fan page, 50 percent have a YouTube channel, and one-third (33 percent) have corporate blogs. Only 20 percent of the major international companies are utilizing all four platforms to engage with stakeholders."
 

{ Comments }

This icon, known as the "feed icon" ...

Image via Wikipedia

How can anyone really think using community and curation tools won’t be a boon to media companies and publishers? The ones that get it are already committed to establishing better ways of sharing and collaborating, baking that mindset into every part of the business.

Not so long ago every pundit preached “community” this and “community” that (me included).  Sure that’s a part of it, but in less than a few years, things like Twitter, Google Buzz and a newsier Facebook have forced private and public institutions alike to look outside of their comfy websites and community hubs.  Brands and online publishers realize the conversations happening in other online environments and niches can often overshadow much of the activity taking place on their own web properties.

The BBC’s recent statements underscore much of the shift taking place not only in media outfits but in corporations, where internal and external teams are scrambling for the right mix of engagement and listening.

"For BBC news editors, Twitter and RSS readers are to become essential tools, says Horrocks. Aggregating and curating content with attribution should become part of a BBC journalist’s assignment; and BBC’s journalists have to integrate and listen to feedback for a better understanding of how the audience is relating to the BBC brand."
Shifting Roles and Perceived Priorities
 
The other thing you’ll see as the aforementioned scrambling takes place is a shifting of skill sets and even roles. Most companies don’t need a social media director, they just need their own employees to rally around their own assets. Or another way to put it. What’s important to organizations is understanding how to scale what’s already right under their noses.
 
Knowledge, customers, alliances – all the things that make a business a business – are what all of us have to become better at promoting and publicizing. Most companies need a good communications playbook way more than they need any technology, media plan or whiz-bang strategist.

And somewhere between the analysis paralysis and the trip to the CFO’s office lies the epiphany that you and your company can do this stuff. You see, you’ve been talking to customers all along and you pay people to make sure they’re happy with your product or service. What you haven’t been so focused on is helping them understand it’s ok to connect with them in other environments, around the global water cooler, if you will.

As the social web and 2.0 mindset fades into the fabric of business, the things corporations will ultimately cling to will be collective wisdom, innovation and the desire to make a difference. That’s more than a skill set. That’s passion and that’s willingness to change.
 
 

 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

{ Comments }

Image representing Aardvark as depicted in Cru...

Image via CrunchBase

I kept trying to connect all the the dots around Google Buzz over the last few days and ran across this quote from Chris Messina.

“In fact, I’d argue that Buzz is as much about Google creating a new channel for conversation in a familiar place as it is about how we’re going about building its public developer surfaces. Although today’s Buzz API only offers a real-time read-only activity stream, the goal is to move quickly towards implementing a host of other technologies — most of which should be familiar to readers of this blog.”

That obviously speaks well to the "open web" movement and how Google is positioning its APIs. Whether or not dropping social elements in GMail is your idea of better collaboration, it’s hard to deny that familiarity with something as utilitarian as email breeds adoption.

But to think email is the only anchor the Buzz ship will hitch itself too is naive. Even if Buzz can make a permanent home in your inbox, that might be enough for it to make inroads against Microsoft and IBM in the messaging wars. In fact, just last week Gartner made some predictions about the forthcoming collision of email and social networks.

gartner

“By 2014, social networking services will replace e-mail as the primary vehicle for interpersonal communications for 20 percent of business users.”

“Greater availability of social networking services both inside and outside the firewall, coupled with changing demographics and work styles will lead 20 percent of users to make a social network the hub of their business communications. Social networking will prove to be more effective than e-mail for certain business activities such as status updates and expertise location.
“The rigid distinction between e-mail and social networks will erode.”

With Aardvark in the Google arsenal, it immediately gets deeper into social search, mobile and more importantly sets the stage for biting off bigger pieces of the enterprise. Think about how Aardvark could easily be repurposed as a self-service support tool incorporated into the fabric of Google Apps — with Buzz as the interface to support systems or social CRM services. All of sudden, it’s not just email that’s housing all that collaboration, it’s just another interface.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

{ Comments }

I’m not discounting Box.net’s recent mobile moves, but from a platform perspective, the SMB market is really where it needs to focus.

All this SharePoint competitive stuff makes for good fodder but it’s not terribly realistic to compete against SharePoint within the confines of big corp. USA – otherwise deemed “the enterprise.”

 

“In the last 18 months, we’ve watched as Box.net has transitioned from a cloud storage solution into an entire cloud-based content management system. At this point, Box.net is actively pitting itself against Microsoft’s SharePoint for small and large business users.”

Too many companies have invested too much in SharePoint to move away so quickly. Box will be bought and sold or become three different things before SharePoint subsides in the enterprise.

You see, people don’t install portals anymore, they install SharePoint. And those SharePoint implementations – good or bad – are the gateway to the rest of the business apps and workflows that users access to get work done.

I do think Box.net can continue to make inroads however, with mobile obviously being one of the catalysts. Mashable’s Christina Warren describes its mobile improvements.

 
"Box.net 2.0 adds in file preview (similar to the enhancements rolled out last month for the full site), the ability to comment and view comments on files or folders, the ability to share files or folders straight from the app, and the ability to view updates to an account or project."
That’s pretty big. I haven’t seen a mobile-oriented collaboration app that provides that level of user-generated content on the device, though there’s probably something. That’s just the kind of capability that makes early adopters prone to introducing things like Box.net behind the corporate firewall. And there’s every possibility they’ll crack an enterprise nut or two along the way.
 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

{ Comments }