<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mostly Media - Definitely Digital &#187; Advertising Rants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wowfeed.com/category/advertising-rants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wowfeed.com</link>
	<description>we like it when media and technology collide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:47:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Top 5 Most Annoying Online Ads // Which One Do You Despise?</title>
		<link>http://www.wowfeed.com/2009/08/26/top-5-most-annoying-online-ads-which-one-do-you-despise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wowfeed.com/2009/08/26/top-5-most-annoying-online-ads-which-one-do-you-despise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Dearing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wowfeed.com/2009/08/26/top-5-most-annoying-online-ads-which-one-do-you-despise/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Hover Ads get my vote hands-down. And it&#8217;s a double thumbs down for the ones that move across the screen horizontally and are impossible to click the right spot to close.
Hover ads – A different take on traditional pop-up advertisements, hover ads are the ones that pop up and play a video after you accidentally [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wpbuzzer_button" style="float: right"><a title="Post on Google Buzz" class="google-buzz-button" href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post" data-button-style="normal-count" data-url="http://www.wowfeed.com/2009/08/26/top-5-most-annoying-online-ads-which-one-do-you-despise/" data-imageurl=""></a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.google.com/buzz/api/button.js"></script></div><p></p><div class="posterous_bookmarklet_entry">
<p>Hover Ads get my vote hands-down. And it&#8217;s a double thumbs down for the ones that move across the screen horizontally and are impossible to click the right spot to close.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Hover ads</strong> – A different take on traditional pop-up advertisements, hover ads are the ones that pop up and play a video after you accidentally scroll over them with your mouse. The ad’s purpose is to distract you and hide some of the site’s content for a few seconds. Hover ads are especially annoying because you can’t use a pop-up blocker to prevent them. I often watch the whole video before figuring out how to close the ad. Here’s an example of a hover ad for Project Runway that I found on TV.com</p>
</blockquote>
<p><img title="pr ad" alt="pr ad" src="http://gigaom.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/pr-ad.png?w=300&amp;h=36" width="300" height="36" /></p>
<div class="posterous_quote_citation"><img src="http://www.crunchbase.com/assets/images/resized/0001/4325/14325v1-max-150x150.png" />       <br />via <a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/08/26/top-5-most-annoying-online-ads/">gigaom.com</a></div>
<div class="posterous_quote_citation">&#160;</div>
<div class="posterous_quote_citation"><a href="http://georgedearing.com/top-5-most-annoying-online-ads-which-one-do-y"></a>&#160;</div>
</p></div>
<div style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px" class="zemanta-pixie"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/3a109f26-ce22-4897-bfa3-ecf4604d465a/"><img style="border-bottom-style: none; border-right-style: none; border-top-style: none; float: right; border-left-style: none" class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=3a109f26-ce22-4897-bfa3-ecf4604d465a" /></a></div>
<div style='display:none' id="post-refEl-1645"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wowfeed.com/2009/08/26/top-5-most-annoying-online-ads-which-one-do-you-despise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WPP Chief Sums Up The Changing Advertising And Media Landscape</title>
		<link>http://www.wowfeed.com/2008/07/08/wpp-chief-sums-up-the-changing-advertising-and-media-landscape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wowfeed.com/2008/07/08/wpp-chief-sums-up-the-changing-advertising-and-media-landscape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Dearing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wowfeed.com/2008/07/08/wpp-chief-sums-up-the-changing-advertising-and-media-landscape/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Last week Reuters UK reported that Taylor Nelson Sofres (TNS) rejected the latest bid from WPP, the world&#8217;s second largest ad firm. Sounds like they&#8217;re closer to becoming bedfellows with WPP&#8217;s German counterpart, GfK.
I thought WPP chieftain Martin Sorrell covered all the bases as he described his firm&#8217;s motivation:
&#8220;Growth is being driven by continuous [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wpbuzzer_button" style="float: right"><a title="Post on Google Buzz" class="google-buzz-button" href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post" data-button-style="normal-count" data-url="http://www.wowfeed.com/2008/07/08/wpp-chief-sums-up-the-changing-advertising-and-media-landscape/" data-imageurl=""></a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.google.com/buzz/api/button.js"></script></div><p></p><p><a href="http://wowfeed.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/tns.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="52" alt="TNS" src="http://wowfeed.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/tns-thumb.jpg" width="244" align="left" border="0"></a> Last week Reuters <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUKL0314570620080703?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=businessNews">UK reported that Taylor Nelson Sofres (TNS) rejected the latest bid</a> from <a href="http://www.wpp.com/WPP/About/">WPP</a>, the world&#8217;s second largest ad firm. <br />Sounds like they&#8217;re closer to becoming bedfellows with WPP&#8217;s German counterpart, <a href="http://www.gfk.com/">GfK</a>.</p>
<p>I thought WPP chieftain Martin Sorrell covered all the bases as he described his firm&#8217;s motivation:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Growth is being driven by continuous pressure on clients to raise<br />their like-for-like revenue growth and to optimise their investment<br />against a backdrop of changing demographics, decreasing product<br />differentiation, intensifying global competition, the fragmentation of<br />the media and the impact of digital development.&#8221;</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>The forces at work here are disruptive to say the least. The big agencies are getting pressure from clients to move away from costly print and TV ads and move to more conversational forms of marketing and advertising. It&#8217;s not enough to just deploy a microsite and track page views. Customers want real-time information and they&#8217;re demanding it on their terms.</p>
<p>If I were a mid-market or large brand, I&#8217;d cut down on the one-off microsites and email-based newsletters and move the conversation to more interactive environments. Many companies have figured out that tapping the collective wisdom of their customer base provides huge value. Evidence of this is the large number of customer-driven communities and B2B networks getting sponsorship deals from consumer brands and software companies. It&#8217;s likely these communities are where your customers are lurking anyway or they&#8217;re building their own versions. Why not engage with them on their terms and in their environments?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not calling for the death of traditional marketing techniques &#8211; unless there&#8217;s no infusion of 21st Century smarts.</p>
<div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="scid:0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:195f4bf4-1059-4bcf-a8f2-87dbc0544c34" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/WPP" rel="tag">WPP</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Taylor+Nelson+Sofres" rel="tag">Taylor+Nelson+Sofres</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/advertising" rel="tag">advertising</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/marketing" rel="tag">marketing</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/interactive" rel="tag">interactive</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/agencies" rel="tag">agencies</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/social+media" rel="tag">social+media</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/conversational+marketing" rel="tag">conversational+marketing</a></div>
<div style='display:none' id="post-refEl-574"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wowfeed.com/2008/07/08/wpp-chief-sums-up-the-changing-advertising-and-media-landscape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
